Sherry Shaw wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>>
>> I.e., not that you're "ignoring them" as unworthy, but that you're 
>> "ignoring them" when counting the percentage of people who make lots 
>> of money. You obviously interact more with people who make lots of 
>> money - that's how they make it.
>>
> 
> Rich people don't associate with the likes of me.  I don't mind a bit.

Well, it's good to know that makes you more of an expert than the IRS on 
how many rich people are paying taxes. Thanks for playing.

(Geez, is it me, or has everyone in the last couple weeks been playing 
the Creationism Logic Game here? "It's hard for me to believe that rich 
people pay a lot of tax in spite of the evidence presented, therefore 
I'll argue it must not be true without providing any evidence of my 
own."  "It's hard for me to believe some people use non-relational data 
storage in spite of being provided with a list of both reasons and 
users, so I'll claim it's true without any evidence to counter it.")

>> Me, I think I know very few people who make >$250K who don't have 
>> millions and millions of dollars.  (I know a fair number of people who 
>> have millions and millions of dollars, tho.)
> 
> Whoa, how could anyone ever have guessed that?

Unfortunately, I'm not one of them. And unfortunately they're not giving 
me any of their money any more.

But I apologize if I've actually insulted you.  It wasn't my intention 
to do so.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message